Comparison of once-weekly teriparatide and alendronate against new osteoporotic vertebral fractures at week 12.

The objective of the present multicenter randomized study was to compare weekly teriparatide with alendronate in their inhibition of vertebral collapse, effects on delayed union, pain relief, and improvement of quality of life (QOL) in women with new osteoporotic vertebral fractures within 1 week after onset of the fracture. Patients were randomly allocated to the teriparatide and alendronate groups. Vertebral collapse, low back pain assessed by a visual analog scale, and QOL assessed by EuroQol 5 dimension at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 after the start of the treatment were compared between the groups. Lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) at baseline and week 12 and the rate of delayed union at week 12 were also compared. Each group consisted of 48 subjects. Vertebral collapse progressed over time in both groups, with no significant difference between the groups. Pain on rising up from lying position, turning over in bed, and resting in the lying position improved over time in both groups, with no significant difference between the groups. There were no significant differences in increase in BMD and delayed union. QOL in the teriparatide group showed significant improvement in comparison with that in the alendronate group at week 12. The weekly formulation of teriparatide showed comparable inhibition of vertebral collapse, increase in BMD, promotion of bone union, and improvement of pain and significant improvement of QOL at week 12 in comparison with alendronate in patients with a new osteoporotic vertebral fracture within 1 week after onset of the fracture. The weekly formulation of teriparatide may have improved components of QOL other than pain at week 12.

Efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on zoledronic acid-induced acute-phase reactions: randomized, open-label, Japanese OZ study.

INTRODUCTION: Zoledronic acid infusion is used to treat osteoporosis but patients, especially Japanese patients, often experience acute-phase reactions (APRs). In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study, we examined the efficacy of the most commonly used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug loxoprofen in Japan in reducing the incidence rate of zoledronic acid-induced APRs and body temperature, and investigated risk/protective factors for APRs in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 60 years with primary osteoporosis (n = 368) were allocated randomly to zoledronic acid plus loxoprofen (ZOL + LOX) or zoledronic acid alone (ZOL). All patients received 5-mg zoledronic acid infusion on day 1, and patients in the ZOL + LOX group also received 120 mg and 180 mg of oral loxoprofen on days 1 and 2, respectively. Adverse events and body temperature were recorded during the 7-day observation period. RESULTS: The incidence rates of APRs were 34.4% (64/186 patients) and 47.8% (87/182 patients) in the ZOL + LOX and ZOL groups, respectively (P = 0.0109). The proportions of patients with increased body temperature (≥ 1 °C and ≥ 37.5 °C) were similar in both groups (P = 0.1186). Past bisphosphonate users had a significantly lower incidence rate of APRs than treatment-naïve patients (odds ratio 0.444, 95% confidence interval 0.285-0.692, P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: Zoledronic acid-induced APRs appeared to be suppressed by loxoprofen. Known risk/protective factors, including prior osteoporosis treatment, were applicable to Japanese patients.

Treatment with once-weekly alendronate oral jelly compared with once-weekly alendronate oral tablet for Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis: An open-label, prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Clinical data regarding alendronate jelly are limited. We compared the efficacy and safety of once-weekly alendronate oral jelly with once-weekly alendronate tablet formulations in the context of primary osteoporosis. METHODS: In this 6-month, open-label, prospective, observational study, Japanese patients aged ≥60 years with primary osteoporosis were included from 14 primary care centres in Japan. The effects of once-weekly alendronate oral jelly and tablet formulations on bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers, and quality of life related to gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed at baseline and 6 months. Treatment was allocated by patient preference. This potentially confounding factor was adjusted for statistically. RESULTS: In total, 170 patients were enrolled (jelly, n = 97; tablet, n = 73). Mean percent changes in radius, lumbar spine, femoral neck, and hip BMD were similar in both treatment groups at 6 months. Both formulations decreased tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) and procollagen 1 N-terminal peptide (P1NP) between baseline and 6 months (by about 50% and 60%, respectively); no significant differences in mean changes were noted in these markers between groups. At 6 months, no significant differences were noted in visual analogue scale or EuroQOL five-dimension questionnaire scores between groups. The jelly group had significantly lower scores than the tablet group in the Izumo scale domains of heartburn (-0.81, P = 0.0040), epigastralgia (-0.94, P = 0.0003), and epigastric fullness (-0.49, P = 0.044). During treatment, more patients discontinued for upper gastrointestinal symptoms in the tablet group (n = 4) than the jelly group (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly alendronate oral jelly 35 mg may be a suitable alternative therapeutic agent for primary osteoporosis in Japan.